Although they had once been close friends, Manly felt a moral imperative to publicly denounce Newbold’s work in the “interests of scientific truth.” “In my opinion,” he wrote, “the Newbold claims are entirely baseless and should be definitely and absolutely rejected. Hannig ranks as an outstanding expert in the ancient Egyptian language and is working for several years now. Rainer Hannig has succeeded in deciphering the mysterious Voynich Manuscript, according to a report released by the Roemer-und Pelizaeus-Museum at Hildesheim, Germany. Newbold’s solution was debunked in 1931 by University of Chicago classicist John Matthews Manly in a journal of medieval studies called Speculum, leaving Newbold posthumously disgraced. After years of research, the renowned Egyptologist Prof. Stylistic analysis indicates it may have been composed in Italy during the Italian Renaissance. It features drawings of unknown, exotic looking plants and many depictions of nude women. 18 The vellum on which it is written has been carbon-dated to the early 15th century (14041438). Escrito por Mila Yanovska In case anyone is unaware of the Voynich manuscript or its significance, it is a document that has been carbon-dated to the early 15th century which has long baffled scholars. In June 1921, the monthly magazine Hearst’s International announced that University of Pennsylvania Professor William Newbold had “come upon the key to the secret cipher of the Manuscript … and the truth of six hundred years ago is coming out!” Newbold surmised that 13th-century English scientist Roger Bacon had written the manuscript with the aid of a microscope and a telescope, centuries before the invention of either instrument. The Voynich manuscript is an illustrated codex, hand-written in an unknown script referred to as 'Voynichese'. (Image credit: Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale. For centuries, the Voynich Manuscript has resisted interpretation, which hasn’t stopped a host of would-be readers from claiming they’ve solved it. And last week, a hullaballoo erupted over a Times Literary Supplement piece by historical researcher and television writer Nicholas Gibbs, who claimed to have solved the enduring Voynich mystery. The Voynich manuscripts unintelligible writings and strange illustrations have defied every attempt at understanding their meaning. Rugg added that there are features that in the text that are inconsistent with most secret codes, such as the separation of words, which would in theory make it easier to crack.įollow Megan Gannon on Twitter and Google+. For hundreds of years, this 15th-century. An emotional investment in the Voynich manuscript offers little in the way of return. "I don't think there's much chance that the Voynich manuscript is simply an unidentified language, because there are too many features in its text that are very different from anything found in any real language." The manuscript is currently held at Yale University. "It's been accepted for decades that the statistical properties of Voynichese are similar, but not identical, to those of real languages," Gordon Rugg, a researcher from Keele University, told the BBC. Some academics brushed off the findings, saying they're still convinced the manuscript is simply a hoax, not a lost language or an undecipherable code. "While the mystery of origins and meaning of the text still remain to be solved, the accumulated evidence about organization at different levels, limits severely the scope of the hoax hypothesis and suggests the presence of a genuine linguistic structure," Montemurro and Zanette concluded.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |